User stories
Structured, quotable. Each story is independently scopeable so estimates don't bundle ambiguity.
A fixed-price discovery sprint for founders whose idea is clear in their head but not yet on paper. No code. No UI design. Just the thinking that turns a vision into a buildable artifact.
Founders rarely struggle with the idea. They struggle with articulating the idea well enough that a builder can quote it without inflating the scope to absorb the ambiguity.
Without a clear spec, every estimate balloons. Every agency hedges. Every vibe-coded prototype solves the wrong subproblem. The idea is fine — what's missing is the structured artifact that turns it into a project.
The Sprint produces that artifact. Nothing more, nothing less.
Structured, quotable. Each story is independently scopeable so estimates don't bundle ambiguity.
What's in V1 and — equally important — what's deferred to V2. The line is drawn before anyone codes.
For grounding flows, not for designing UI. No high-fidelity mocks. The point is clarity, not aesthetics.
Data model, integration surface, auth/multi-tenant strategy, AI scope (if any). The decisions that ripple into the build.
How you'll know V1 worked. Specific, measurable. Tied to actual user behavior, not vanity counts.
Tier mapping (Origin / Core / Pinnacle), timeline, and what's out of scope. You leave with a quotable artifact.
Founder-led on the substance. Senior-facilitated on the structure. Async between working sessions; outputs land in a shared workspace as we go.
A deep 90-minute call. We pull the idea apart — users, jobs to be done, the why-now, the success conditions. By the end you've articulated what you'd otherwise spend weeks circling.
We translate the conversation into structured user stories and primary/edge use cases. Each one is a quotable scope unit — what the system does, who it does it for, what it costs to skip.
We carve the MVP from the wishlist. Low-fi wireframes — only enough to ground the user flows, not to design UI. The output: a scope a builder can quote, not a Figma file you still have to interpret.
We sketch the data model, integration surface, and architectural shape. We deliver a build estimate against Launchpad tiers — Origin, Core, or Pinnacle — so you know exactly what to commission.
Final 60-minute walkthrough. You leave with a portable spec — yours to take to us, to another builder, or to your in-house team if you have one. No lock-in, no IP entanglement.
Founder, VectorLabs · ex-Director of Eng, Palo Alto Networks
The Sprint is run by the founder, not delegated. Senior product judgment is the entire point of paying for it — and that's the part that doesn't scale by adding people. The output is whatever forty hours of senior thinking can produce in a focused window.
IIT Delhi · Google · Coursera · Co-founder, Gamma AI (acquired by PANW) · Director of Engineering on a $50M+ ARR security product at Palo Alto Networks.
100% credited toward Launchpad if you proceed within 30 days. Worst case, you walk away with a portable spec.
Because the build cost depends entirely on the spec. A clear spec turns a $200K guess into a $25K commitment. Founders who skip this step routinely pay 2–3x more than founders who don't — not because the build was harder, but because the scope was hazier.
Fractional CPOs want a 3–6 month embedded engagement at $5–15K/month. The Sprint is 7–10 days, fixed-price, with a quotable spec at the end. We deliver and disappear — no retainer, no relationship dependency. (And we credit it back if you build with us.)
No. The spec is portable — yours to take anywhere. Build with us, build with another team, build in-house. The Sprint is a deliverable, not a sales funnel. The credit-back if you proceed is a bonus, not a hook.
That's the point. Most ideas change once they hit a structured user-story and use-case framework — that's the founder learning what they actually meant. Pivots inside the Sprint window are included; we follow where the thinking goes.
You keep the spec. We've done the work; you've paid for it. No pressure. Most founders who don't proceed with us either build in-house or with another team — and the spec works just as well there.